Round 1: Hobbes Vs. The Metaphysicals in the 17th Century. We will endeavour to examine the fundamental theme of "love vs. power" encapsulated in these two positions with the hope that we may, through our scintillating use of literary support, rhetoric, and polemic, find out which one emerges most capable of explaining both the seventeeth century, and the world in general? Who will be victorious? LET'S GET READY TO RUMBLLLLEEEE!

Thursday, March 16, 2006

On the life well-lived...

Along the lines of our discussion and the debate that ensued surrounding the good-life, and whether a life lived striving for comfort/balance/mediocrity/complacency was a decent principle of living, and whether a peaceful, balanced life comprises a good life.

A bit self-indulgent I know, and a bit tropy and cliched, but I seem to find myself debating this issue quite often. And our discussion reminded me of this thing i wrote a few months ago. I've no pretentions about being a good poet, but it sort of encapsulates my position. So I thought it might be vaguely appropriate.



reflection on the life well-lived

Life is not for comfort's sake,
nor is a still room enough to keep
its flame - Life is not peace.

Life is not peace, but a wonderful violence
and a tender fist of bruised of earth
and the welt that spreads a blush.

Life is the struggle, to live to fear
to find disparity in dispositions,
and disparate - life binds the desperate.

Life occurs in pains, and colours
and names itself with clamour,
or writes itself in scars.

Life is not peace, Peace speaks:
absolute - with such-silence.
Life is our oldest verb - its
'in the doing', and the changing.

Life haunts by groves of sycamour
though they keep holds of death in sight.
Life is the Immanence: the in this 'thisness'.

Life is our lettings go,
and our fallings together.

-BN

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home